Counter Insurgency aircraft back to the basics; COIN aircraft needed
COIN = Counter-insurgency
Here are the requirements for the COIN aircraft; it is easier to read from the PIXS (Pre-award Information Exchange Systems) though.
The requirements are in short.
~Must be in place (Iraq) by 30 NOV 2008
~This is for Eight (8) aircraft
~Options for more aircraft
~Commercial off the shelf aircraft (COTS) to be modified for COIN mission
~2 seats
~Turboprop PT-6-based turboprop engine fueled by JP-8 or similar fuel to maintain commonality with other Iraqi aircraft
~1200 SHP minimum
~Must be able to perform a dual role as a trainer. Possess crew stations for a two-man crew with dual sets of flight, navigation, communication, and weapons controls with weapons delivery able to be performed from either seat.
~Be suitable as an intermediate/advanced single-engine fixed-wing flight trainer with systems which allow the aircraft to be easily reconfigured for COIN operations.
~Possess light armor to protect the occupants of both seats and engine compartment from small arms fire.
~NVG compatible cockpit (can you still say cockpit?)
~Be capable of loitering in excess of 4 hours while maintaining a 45 minute fuel reserve while loaded with two GBU-12 or Mk-82 type weapons.
~Be equipped with ejection seats that provide safe ejection parameters at ground level with zero airspeed.
~The COIN aircraft must be capable of sustaining fully mission capable (FMC) operations availability rates of eighty percent (80%).
So, let me get this straight…They want an already developed, single turbo prop powered by a PT-6 rated at 1200SHP+, two seats (Is side by side is ok? Or is tandem what they want?) Loiter time of 4 hours plus reserves, and the ability to carry at least two (2) 500lb class bombs.
Well, the best aircraft for the job is ruled out immediately. The OV-10 Bronco is the ultimate COIN aircraft. The props are behind the pilot (and crew) and it has bulbous cockpit windows so that the view is second to none. The OV-10s performance on the ground and in the air is also second to none…but, she has two engines so she will not be considered and those engines are of the Garrett-AiResearch T76 family…though, I am sure you could fit PT-6s to them (a shame too…I am sure there are several over at AMARC that would like to be saved from the smelter.)
Another airplane that was designed for the COIN mission is the FMA IA-58 Pucara. She is an older design but built like a truck. Again, she is ruled out because she has two engines and also they are not of the PT-6 family.
So, they want basically a trainer that can carry a load.
Some that comes to mind,
• Raytheon /Hawker /Beechcraft T-6B Texan II …would be delivered as the AT-6 (not a bad aircraft)
• Embraer EMB312 (AT-27) Tucano (in service with the FAB) This is a great aircraft for the mission because she was built as an attack aircraft first, trainer second...she is very heavy... Out of the realistic two, I'd take this one. plus, after the US blocked a sale of these to Venezuela...think we might want to throw them a bone?
• PC-9 (same as the T
-6B) originated by Pilatus
• KT-1 Woong Bee (they don’t have a chance plus its powerplant is rated at 937SHP)
The AU-23A
and the AU-24A
would be great aircraft as well, but I am guessing they will not be asked to join the competition. (a modern Pilatus PC-6 could fit this)
The Stavatti Machete SM-27S/T is a radical design, and it is not what I would call off the shelf....not what I would call realistic either...I think I saw one of these in the 80's on some Japanese cartoon!
U.S.Aircraft Corporation purpose built a COIN aircraft called the A-67 Dragon. I like this aircraft, it looks like a mix between the T-6B and a homebuilt Glassair with a PT-6 engine but again, I do not know if it would fit the bill, I am not sure it would be considered an Commercial off the shelf aircraft. New news about this plane... it suffered a gear collaps on a test flight.
Mentioned by Maj William Brian Downs, USAF a member of the 6th SOS out of Hurlburt Field, FL.(killed in Iraq 30 May 2005 along with Capt. Derek M. Argel, Capt. Jeremy J. Fresques, and Staff Sgt. Casey J. Crate when their compare 7SL crashed north of Baghdad on a training mission)
He said that a good platform for COIN would be Thrush Vigilante also known as the AYERES V-1-A Vigilante
I like this aircraft a lot and though not a good looking plane, we know that it is rugged as hell and would be able to do the mission at hand. Reports are that once the production went to Thrush that the Vigilante died...lets hope not, lets hope they join the competition.
(this is the Thrush 660 crop duster)
This thing is built like a rock, maneuverable, can carry a heavy load and is a damn rock….did I mention, it is built like a rock?
It will be interesting to see what comes out of this, but my money is on the T-6B/AT-6
5 comments:
My local AFA Chapter just had a guest speaker from Beale AFB (my old, and last, base). He gave a HUGE presentation on Global Hawk.
While it may not _SEEM_ like it is COIN, it is! When you consider the fact that the kill chain (see my posts on 5GW for more) can be shortened to 10 MINUTES USING GLOBAL HAWK ...
Oh yeah, we can have COIN - even though the platform COSTS SOME COIN!!! :)
Funny thing is, all other sorties are human bound to roughly 12/16 hour max. Global Hawk has ~32 hours on station ...
Heh-heh ... :)
Oh yeah - and one of my favorite models that I built when I was a kid was the OV-10a. When I started to read this post, and hadn't scrolled down yet, that was the platform that first came to mind, for me. :)
Heh, really cool plane ...
Hey, Herk, soon I'll post a photo that'll intrigue you. :) You'll have to _guess_ what it is, based on your experience. I picked this up in 1983, Rhein Main AFB ...
The rest, is, well ... you'll see ... :)
I think that the Global Hawk is one of the few UAVs that I really like. Her ability to master the U-2s mission is second to none. And you are right; her time on station is equal to none. I consider her more recon only... You will still need a human to kill the target. The Predator sure is unmanned on the aircraft but is limited to the same pilot type skills on the ground...minus all the situational awareness that a piloted aircraft has.
Recon is the key to any engagement and yes, the GH has shortened the chain but like the grunts on the ground giving the coordinates to the AC-130 (in 1970) the GH has to relay that info to "someone" to execute the kill.
I have a HUGE problem with the armed UAVs at the moment (and sure, they will get better) but right now, they are still more of a novelty. The Predator crashes more than any other aircraft not because it is a horrible aircraft but because the person flying it has such a limited field of view and a massive lack of situational awareness...he/she can not feel the aircraft vibrate, can not hear the engine...can not smell the smoke...sure, they might have dummy lights but nothing can compare to the actual thing.
Fix4RSO said... Hey, Herk, soon I'll post a photo that'll intrigue you. :) You'll have to _guess_ what it is, based on your experience. I picked this up in 1983, Rhein Main AFB ...
The rest, is, well ... you'll see ... :)
I can't wait...
OK, the item is up - have fun!
In regards to GH and actually hitting the target from the platform, true, you still need boots on the ground to prosecute. However, if this aircraft could call in an AC-130 ... who needs boots on the ground, just jump boots in the air.
I believe that the silent hit is what is best against an insurgency. While the OV-10, as an example, is a great platform, it has little of the mystique of say the Global Hawk, the Blackbird, or The Dragon Lady. Well, I guess the same unease can be found with the F-117 and the B-2 using targeted ordnance.
Hmmm ... ya got me thinking again regarding a post on 5GW ... that and the Global Hawk speaker's mission ...
Post a Comment